|
In selected patients, the skin and subcutaneous fat
of the anterolateral thigh can be quite thin, making this flap a potentially
large donor site of supple and sensate fasciocutaneous tissue. The skin
paddle can be as large as 8 by 25 centimeters with primary closure attainable.
Wider flaps can be harvested if the surgeon is prepared to skin graft the donor
area. The flap has a large caliber pedicle, but the anatomy can be
variable. Most flaps in our experience require dissection of
musculocutaneous perforators and are infrequently supplied solely by the
septocutaneous branches. Musculocutaneous perforators nourish over 80
percent of flaps making this perforator flap dissection potentially difficult
and tedious. It is not recommended for the inexperienced microsurgeon.
Anatomy
The anterolateral thigh flap lies on the axis of
the septum dividing the vastus lateralis and the rectus femoris muscles.
This is depicted by the flap outline in the figure below on the left. Arterial inflow is supplied by the
descending branch of the lateral femoral circumflex artery (middle and right
figures below). This branch
arises from the profunda femoral trunk. The lateral femoral circumflex
artery distributes both ascending and descending branches, the latter supplying
the perforators to the anterolateral thigh flap. This descending branch
travels deep within the space between the rectus femoris muscle and the vastus
lateralis muscle - often deep in the septal plane, but on occasion within the substance
of the rectus femoris muscle. This septal plane can be used to identify the artery and flap blood supply if the septum is accompanied by at
least one septocutaneous perforatorating artery and vein. If no septocutaneous
perforators are present, the superior portion of the septal plane that meets the
tensor fascia lata muscle can be used to find the lateral femoral circumflex
vessels of the descending branch. In 80% of cases, the descending branch
distributes musculotcutaneous perforators to the flap. When it runs
its entire course inferiorly in the substance of the rectus femoris
muscle, flap dissection can be difficult.
The pedicle can be as long as 7 or 8 centimeters.
Depending on the point of ligation, the artery size can vary from 1 to 2
millimeters in size, with the major draining vein running slightly larger.
Usually two venae accompany the artery.
The flap can be innervated by a major branch of the
lateral cutaneous nerve of the thigh. This branch enters the flap at the
superior aspect, and can be traced proximally to provide length.

Flap Dissection
The axis of the surface of the septum between the
rectus femoris and the vastus lateralis is marked by a line connecting the
anterior superior iliac spine and the lateral patella. This line is
divided into thirds for purposes of outlining the flap. The junction of
the proximal and middle third is often the site of a perforator that pierces the
tensor fascia lata. We mark this and incorporate this point in the
flap. The TFL perforator can be a lifeboat in the rare circumstance when
the distal perforators are of poor quality or injured during dissection.
The junction of the middle and distal third is marked and is also incorporated
into the flap. This area defined by the middle third of the
axis line generally encompasses all perforating vessels. We do not as a
rule use a pencil Doppler probe to try to identify perforators. We
have found this is sometimes not accurate and the method of incorporation of the
middle third of the septal axis is extremely reliable. The flap can later
be shortened after harvesting when direct visualization of perforators can be
done.

The anterior flap is elevated first, noting any
vessels perforating the substance of the rectus femoris. Vessels
approaching or near the septum are preserved until the posterior flap is
elevated and the nourishing vessels to the flap have been identified with
certainty.

The posterior flap can be elevated to the septum
usually without interference from major perforating vessels in the vastus lateralis. The
septum is identified and any septal perforators are noted.

If one or two good quality perforators are
visualized in the septum, then the anterior elevation can continue until the
septum is isolated both medially and laterally. If the blood supply is
entirely septal, the descending branch of the lateral femoral circumflex artery
is found at the base of the septum between the rectus femoris and vastus
lateralis and traced proximally. The lateral femoral circumflex artery and
vein can then be isolated as the proximal pedicle.

If no septal vessels are found, the perforators
through the rectus femoris must be traced within and through the muscle to the
descending branch of the lateral femoral circumflex artery. The vessels
are then isolated as above to the origin on the lateral femoral circumflex
artery and vein and the flap is ready to be transferred.
The branch through the TFL, with or without TFL
muscle, can be isolated to
augment the blood supply, but is usually ligated and divided to enhance the
mobility of the proximal pedicle. The ascending branch likewise is divided
and the flap is isolated on the lateral femoral circumflex vessels.
For closure, skin and subcutaneous tissue flaps are elevated
medially and laterally at a level superficial to the fascia. These flaps
are closed with interrupted suture and the skin is then approximated.
Although light circumferential pressure can be applied to the thigh
post-operatively, we do use a closed suction drain.
Post-Operative Care
Seroma forms rarely,
but can be a nuisance post-operatively. The patient is allowed to ambulate
as soon as clinically indicated for the reconstruction. Bibliography
-
Begue T, Masquelet AC, Nordin JY: Anatomical
basis of the anterolateral thigh flap. Surg Radiol Anat 12:311, 1990
-
Cormack G: Anterolateral thigh flap:
technical tip to facilitate elevation. Br J Plast Surg 45:74., 1992
-
Demirkan F, Chen HC, Wei FC, Chen HH, Jung SG,
Hau SP, Liao CT: The versatile anterolateral thigh flap: a
musculocutaneous flap in disguise in head and neck reconstruction. Br J
Plast Surg 53:30, 2000
-
Kimata Y, Uchiyama K, Ebihara S, Nakatsuka T,
Harii K: Anatomic variations and technical problems of the anterolateral
thigh flap: a report of 74 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 102:1517, 1998
-
Kimata Y, Uchiyama K, Ebihara S, Sakuraba M,
Iida H, Nakatsuka T, Harii K: Anterolateral thigh flap donor-site
complications and morbidity. Plast Reconstr Surg 106:584, 2000
-
Koshima I, Fukuda H, Utunomiya R, Soeda S:
The anterolateral thigh flap; variations in its vascular pedicle. Br J
Plast Surg 42:260, 1989
-
Koshima I, Fukuda H, Soeda S: Free combined
anterolateral thigh flap and vascularized iliac bone graft with double
vascular pedicle. J Reconstr Microsurg 5:55, 1989
-
Koshima I, Yamamoto H, Hosoda M, Moriguchi T,
Orita Y, Nagayama H: Free combined composite flaps using the lateral
circumflex femoral system for repair of massive defects of the head and
neck regions: an introduction to the chimeric flap principle. Plast
Reconstr Surg 92:411, 1993
-
Koshima I: Free Anterolateral Thigh Flap for
Reconstruction of Head and Neck Defects following Cancer Ablation. Plast
Reconstr Surg 105:2358, 2000
-
Kuo YR, Jeng SF, Kuo MH, Huang MN, Liu YT,
Chiang YC, Yeh MC, Wei FC: Free anterolateral thigh flap for extremity
reconstruction: clinical experience and functional assessment of donor
site. Plast Reconstr Surg 107:1766, 2001
-
Luo S, Raffoul W, Luo J, Luo L, Gao J, Chen
L, Egloff DV: Anterolateral thigh flap: A review of 168 cases.
Microsurgery 19:232, 1999
-
Pribaz JJ, Orgill DP, Epstein MD, Sampson CE,
Hergrueter CA: Anterolateral thigh free flap. Ann Plast Surg 34:585, 1995
-
Song YG, Chen GZ, Song YL: The free thigh
flap: a new free flap concept based on the septocutaneous artery. Br J
Plast Surg 37:149, 1984
-
Yamada N, Kakibuchi M, Kitayoshi H, Matsuda
K, Yano K, Hosokawa K: A new way of elevating the anterolateral thigh
flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 108:1677, 2001
-
Zhou G, Qiao Q, Chen GY, Ling YC, Swift R:
Clinical experience and surgical anatomy of 32 free anterolateral thigh
flap transplantations. Br J Plast Surg 44:91, 1991
|